Primary tabs

More about searches
Search here to find training resources and workshops
  1. Book
    Published

    8.2 Working with protocols and reviews in Archie

    There are a number of functions that Cochrane Information Specialists may use when working with reviews and protocols. A selection are listed below. 8.2.1 Validating reviews and protocols Archie can produce a validation report for individual protocols and ...
  2. Book
    Published

    8.1 Archie features

    You can get help with using Archie for all the features mentioned here. This help is only available after you have logged into Archie. 8.1.1 Organiser, Resources and Search tabs When you open Archie, you will see three tabs- 'Organizer', 'R ...
  3. Book
    Published

    3.4 Using the CRS to manage searches for author teams

    Information specialists can use the CRS as a bibliographic management tool, in similar ways to software packages like EndNote and Reference Manager. References found for a particular review can be imported to the Group’s segment, collated, deduplicated an ...
  4. Book
    Published

    3.3 Using the CRS to maintain a specialised register

    The CRS can be used to maintain either a study-based register, or a reference-based register, which includes reports of studies (see 2.7 Types of Specialised Registers for more information on how these differ). Study reports are added by importing referen ...
  5. Book
    Published

    3.6 Features of the CRS

    The CRS has many features, but some to highlight include: The CRS has built-in machine learning (the Classifier), which uses the classifications from Cochrane Crowd to help users decide if a study report refers to an RCT or a CCT The machine learning tool ...
  6. Book
    Published

    7. Editorial process

    There are four key phases in the life of a systematic review; the review proposal, the protocol, the review and the update. The editorial process for each phase is outlined here, but as there may be variations in the process depending on the review group, ...
  7. Book
    Published

    7.1 Review Proposal

    Prospective authors will submit a review proposal form to the review group. This will be assessed by the editorial team and will either be accepted or rejected. ...
  8. Book
    Published

    7.2 Protocol

    A draft protocol will be submitted within three months of the proposal acceptance, for editorial review.  At this stage that CIS’ are likely to work with authors to draft a search strategy for one of the databases, to be included in the published protocol ...
  9. Book
    Published

    7.3 Review

    Following publication of a protocol a date to run the searches is agreed, if the authors are not running the searches themselves. Depending on how long it has been since the draft strategy was first created, a search may need to be checked and updated as ...
  10. Book
    Published

    7.4 Update

    Reviews may need to be updated for a number of reasons: if new studies are found that could change the conclusions of the review, if there is ongoing uncertainty and new evidence could change practice, if an update has been commissioned by a guideline mak ...

Pages