Primary tabs

More about searches
Search here to find training resources and workshops
  1. Page

    Chapter 9: Summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis

    Joanne E McKenzie, Sue E Brennan, Rebecca E Ryan, Hilary J Thomson, Renea V Johnston Key Points: Synthesis is a process of bringing together data from a set of included studies with the aim of drawing conclusions about a body of evidence. This will includ ...
  2. Page

    Chapter 12: Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods

    Joanne E McKenzie, Sue E Brennan Key Points: Meta-analysis of effect estimates has many advantages, but other synthesis methods may need to be considered in the circumstance where there is incompletely reported data in the primary studies. Alternative syn ...
  3. Page

    Chapter 21: Qualitative evidence

    Jane Noyes, Andrew Booth, Margaret Cargo, Kate Flemming, Angela Harden, Janet Harris, Ruth Garside, Karin Hannes, Tomás Pantoja, James Thomas Key Points: A qualitative evidence synthesis (commonly referred to as QES) can add value by providing decision ma ...
  4. Page

    Chapter 22: Prospective approaches to accumulating evidence

    James Thomas, Lisa M Askie, Jesse A Berlin, Julian H Elliott, Davina Ghersi, Mark Simmonds, Yemisi Takwoingi, Jayne F Tierney, Julian PT Higgins Key Points: Cochrane Reviews should reflect the state of current knowledge, but maintaining their currency is ...
  5. Page

    Chapter 23: Including variants on randomized trials

    Julian PT Higgins, Sandra Eldridge, Tianjing Li Key Points: Non-standard designs, such as cluster-randomized trials and crossover trials, should be analysed using methods appropriate to the design. If the authors of studies included in the review fail to ...
  6. Page

    Chapter 25: Assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study

    Jonathan AC Sterne, Miguel A Hernán, Alexandra McAleenan, Barnaby C Reeves, Julian PT Higgins Key Points: The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool is recommended for assessing the risk of bias in non-randomized studies o ...
  7. Page

    Chapter 11: Undertaking network meta-analyses

    Anna Chaimani, Deborah M Caldwell, Tianjing Li, Julian PT Higgins, Georgia Salanti Key Points: Network meta-analysis is a technique for comparing three or more interventions simultaneously in a single analysis by combining both direct and indirect evidenc ...
  8. Page

    Chapter 16: Equity and specific populations

    Vivian A Welch, Jennifer Petkovic, Janet Jull, Lisa Hartling, Terry Klassen, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Jordi Pardo Pardo, Mark Petticrew, David J Stott, Denise Thomson, Erin Ueffing, Katrina Williams, Camilla Young, Peter Tugwell Key Points: Health equity i ...
  9. Page

    Part 3: Specific perspectives in reviews

    Part 3 provides considerations for tackling systematic reviews from different perspectives, such as when thinking about specific populations, or complex interventions, or particular types of outcomes. It comprises the following chapters: 16.    Equity 17. ...
  10. Page

    Chapter 14: Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence

    Holger J Schünemann, Julian PT Higgins, Gunn E Vist, Paul Glasziou, Elie A Akl, Nicole Skoetz, Gordon H Guyatt; on behalf of the Cochrane GRADEing Methods Group (formerly Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group) and the Cochrane Statistical Method ...