Primary tabs

More about searches
Search here to find training resources and workshops
  1. Page

    Chapter II: Planning a Cochrane Review

    Miranda Cumpston and Jacqueline Chandler Key Points: In planning a Cochrane Review, there are some additional considerations for author teams over and above what is required for other systematic reviews. Proposals for new Cochrane Reviews are submitted by ...
  2. Page

    Chapter IV: Updating a review

    Miranda Cumpston and Jacqueline Chandler Key Points: As new studies are completed, the results of reviews may become out of date and thereby provide misleading information to decision makers. Cochrane Reviews should be assessed periodically to determine w ...
  3. Page

    Chapter 14: Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence

    Holger J Schünemann, Julian PT Higgins, Gunn E Vist, Paul Glasziou, Elie A Akl, Nicole Skoetz, Gordon H Guyatt; on behalf of the Cochrane GRADEing Methods Group (formerly Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group) and the Cochrane Statistical Method ...
  4. Page

    Chapter 18: Patient-reported outcomes

    Bradley C Johnston, Donald L Patrick, Tahira Devji, Lara J Maxwell, Clifton O Bingham III, Dorcas E Beaton, Maarten Boers, Matthias Briel, Jason W Busse, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Robin Christensen, Bruno R da Costa, Regina El Dib, Anne Lyddiatt, Raymond W O ...
  5. Page

    Part 2: Core methods

    Part 2 provides the core methodology for undertaking systematic reviews on the effects of health interventions, with a particular emphasis on reviewing randomized trials. It comprises the following chapters: Starting a review Determining the scope and que ...
  6. Page

    Part 4: Other topics

    Part 4 covers a range of further topics, including reviewing evidence other than straightforward randomized trials. It comprises the following chapters: 22.     Prospective approaches 23.     Variants on randomized trials 24.     Including non-randomized ...
  7. Page

    Chapter 13: Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis

    Matthew J Page, Julian PT Higgins, Jonathan AC Sterne Key Points: Systematic reviews seek to identify all research that meets the eligibility criteria. However, this goal can be compromised by ‘non-reporting bias’: when decisions about how, when or where ...
  8. Page

    Your feedback

    We encourage learners to send us your comments and feedback about the modules:   We're happy to hear feedback of any kind and your comments are always useful to help us make sure the modules are as good a learning experience as p ...
  9. Page

    Chapter 15: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions

    Holger J Schünemann, Gunn E Vist, Julian PT Higgins, Nancy Santesso, Jonathan J Deeks, Paul Glasziou, Elie A Akl, Gordon H Guyatt; on behalf of the Cochrane GRADEing Methods Group Key Points: This chapter provides guidance on interpreting the results of s ...
  10. Page


    English Animamos a los alumnos a que nos envíen sus comentarios y sugerencias sobre los módulos:   Vuestros comentarios y opiniones siempre son útiles para ayudarnos a garantizar que los módulos ofrezcan la mejor experiencia de aprend ...