Index
- Overdiagnosis and Low Value Healthcare (webinar)
- Overviews of reviews
- Part 1: About Cochrane Reviews
- Part 1: About Cochrane Reviews
- Part 1: About Cochrane Reviews
- Part 1: About Cochrane Reviews
- Part 2: Core methods
- Part 2: Core methods
- Part 2: Core methods
- Part 2: Core methods
- Part 2: General issues in pre-specification
- Part 3: Specific perspectives in reviews
- Part 3: Specific perspectives in reviews
- Part 3: Specific perspectives in reviews
- Part 3: Specific perspectives in reviews
- Part 3: The notion of PICO for synthesis
- Part 4: Other topics
- Part 4: Other topics
- Part 4: Other topics
- Part 4: Other topics
- Part 4: Planning a Cochrane review to compare multiple interventions: network meta-analysis
- Part 5: Issues to consider when including qualitative evidence
- Part 6: The problem of multiplicity and the use of hierarchical selection rules
- Part 7: Special issues for addressing adverse effects
- Part 8: Issues in reviews of test accuracy
- Part 9: Questions and answers
- Patient and public involvement in research: What, why and how?
- PDF versions (restricted)
- Peer review policy (webinar)
- Peer review training modules for dietitians
- Performing meta-analyses in the case of very few studies
- Planning eligibility criteria
- Policy on co-publishing Cochrane Reviews in other journals
- Practical methods for handling missing summary statistics in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes
- Pre-submission checklist for authors
- Presentation Styles [webinar]
- Presenting a continuous outcome in ‘Summary of findings’ table
- Presenting a dichotomous outcome in ‘Summary of findings’ table
- Presenting narrative outcomes in ‘Summary of findings’ table
- Priority Setting in Action: experiences from two Cochrane Review Groups
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
- Prognosis Research in Healthcare: Concepts, Methods and Impact: (online workshop)
- Public Engagement and Involvement in Health Research: How well are we doing? Views from the global north vs the global south
- Public Engagement and Involvement in Health Research: How well are we doing? Views from the global north vs the global south
- Public Participation Impact: the other PPI
- Q&A on GRADE and ‘Summary of findings’ tables
- Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) and GRADE-CERQual - Melbourne, Australia
- Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES): Learning Live webinar series
- Quantiles of the marginal and conditional dose-response relation based on weighted mixed-effects models
- Question formulation and protocol development for systematic reviews with network meta-analysis
- Question formulation and searching for qualitative evidence
- Rapid evidence synthesis for COVID-19 research
- Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Balancing rigour with speed (webinar)
- Rapid Reviews - Dr Andrea Tricco (webinar)
- Rapid reviews from the ground up
- Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems
- Reaching an overall RoB judgement and incorporating RoB assessment into analysis and interpretation
- Registration and reporting of drug trials on humans (Cochrane Sweden webinar)
- Reporting guideline for synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM)
- Reporting Guidelines for Equity-Focused Systematic Reviews: PRISMA-E 2012
- RevMan 5 and RevMan Web - important updates for Editorial Staff
- RevMan 5 and RevMan Web - important updates for Editorial Staff
- RevMan Calculator
- RevMan Web: a practical guide for editorial teams
- Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) workshop - Penang, Malaysia
- Risk of Bias 2: Good practice and common errors (Methods Support Unit web clinic)
- RoB 2 Bias in other types of studies: cluster-randomised and cross-over
- RoB 2 Domain 1: Bias arising from the randomisation process
- RoB 2 Domain 2: Bias due to deviations from the intended interventions
- RoB 2 Domain 3: Bias due to missing outcome data
- RoB 2 Domain 4: Bias in measurement of the outcome
- RoB 2 Domain 5: Bias in selection of the reported result
- RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials
- RoB 2: Editorial considerations
- RoB 2: Learning Live webinar series
- Running webinars and virtual workshops: good practice guidance
- Scoping reviews: what they are and how you can do them
- Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers
- Searching for adverse effects
- Selecting studies and assessing methodological limitations
- Sitemap
- Software to Support the Systematic Review Process: York, UK
- Software to Support the Systematic Review Process: York, UK
- Soo Downe: Changing the conversation: How QES reviews can frame and inform guidelines and implementation (webinar)
- Stakeholder Involvement in Evidence Synthesis
- Standardisierte Trainingsmaterialien
- Statistical methods for updating meta-analyses
- Success of living systematic reviews for rapid evidence synthesis and surveillance (Cochrane Ireland webinar)
- Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline
- Systematic Review Advanced Author Training: Dublin, Ireland
- Systematic review of prognosis studies
- Systematic Review Standard Author Training workshop: Michigan, USA
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy 2019 - Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (online workshop)
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of intervention studies: Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of prognosis studies (online workshop, February 2022)
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of prognosis studies: Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies Workshop - Lund, Sweden
- Systematic reviews of preclinical animal research: who are the potential knowledge users?
Pages
Share