Jump to navigation
Index
-
Best practice guidelines on publishing ethics: a publisher’s perspective
-
Bias methods training event
-
BMJ research in evidence-based publishing
-
BMJ training package for peer reviewers
-
BMJ ‘Journalology’ collection
-
Building trust and sharing power for co-creation in Aboriginal health research
-
Challenges in conducting systematic reviews in developing countries
-
Change log (CIL terms and conditions)
-
Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses
-
Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses
-
Chapter 11: Undertaking network meta-analyses
-
Chapter 11: Undertaking network meta-analyses
-
Chapter 12: Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods
-
Chapter 12: Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods
-
Chapter 13: Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis
-
Chapter 13: Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis
-
Chapter 14: Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence
-
Chapter 14: Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence
-
Chapter 15: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions
-
Chapter 15: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions
-
Chapter 16: Equity and specific populations
-
Chapter 16: Equity and specific populations
-
Chapter 17: Intervention complexity
-
Chapter 17: Intervention complexity
-
Chapter 18: Patient-reported outcomes
-
Chapter 18: Patient-reported outcomes
-
Chapter 19: Adverse effects
-
Chapter 19: Adverse effects
-
Chapter 1: Starting a review
-
Chapter 1: Starting a review
-
Chapter 20: Economic evidence
-
Chapter 20: Economic evidence
-
Chapter 21: Qualitative evidence
-
Chapter 21: Qualitative evidence
-
Chapter 22: Prospective approaches to accumulating evidence
-
Chapter 22: Prospective approaches to accumulating evidence
-
Chapter 23: Including variants on randomized trials
-
Chapter 23: Including variants on randomized trials
-
Chapter 24: Including non-randomized studies on intervention effects
-
Chapter 24: Including non-randomized studies on intervention effects
-
Chapter 25: Assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study
-
Chapter 25: Assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study
-
Chapter 26: Individual participant data
-
Chapter 26: Individual participant data
-
Chapter 2: Determining the scope of the review and the questions it will address
-
Chapter 2: Determining the scope of the review and the questions it will address
-
Chapter 3: Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis
-
Chapter 3: Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis
-
Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies
-
Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies
-
Chapter 5: Collecting data
-
Chapter 5: Collecting data
-
Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect
-
Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect
-
Chapter 7: Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies
-
Chapter 7: Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies
-
Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial
-
Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial
-
Chapter 9: Summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis
-
Chapter 9: Summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis
-
Chapter I: Introduction
-
Chapter I: Introduction
-
Chapter II: Planning a Cochrane Review
-
Chapter II: Planning a Cochrane Review
-
Chapter III: Reporting the review
-
Chapter III: Reporting the review
-
Chapter IV: Updating a review
-
Chapter IV: Updating a review
-
Chapter V: Overviews of Reviews
-
Chapter V: Overviews of Reviews
-
Choosing images for sharing evidence: a guide
-
CINeMA – Confidence in network meta-analysis
-
Citation Analysis – Discovering New Uses Within Systematic Reviews: York, UK
-
Co-production in Action
-
Cochrane 20 video series
-
Cochrane and Wikipedia: Improve online health-related information accessed by billions of people each year. How, When, and Why
-
Cochrane Belgium: Systematic Review course
-
Cochrane ClassMate [webinar]
-
Cochrane Classmate: A tool for trainers
-
Cochrane Consumer workshop: Indianapolis, IN, USA
-
Cochrane Editorial & Methods Department good practice guidance
-
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
-
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
-
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
-
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
-
Cochrane handsearching course
-
Cochrane Information Specialists' Handbook
-
Cochrane Interactive Learning multimedia
-
Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an intervention review
-
Cochrane International Mobility
-
Cochrane Register of Studies and importing references in RevMan
-
Cochrane Standard Author Training: Edmonton, Canada
-
Cochrane Standards for preparing Plain Language Summaries
-
Cochrane Statistical Methods Group training course
-
Cochrane Style Manual
-
Cochrane Systematic Review Training Workshop: Indianapolis, IN, USA
-
Cochrane Systematic Review Training Workshop: Québec. Canada
-
Cochrane Systematic Review Training Workshop: Québec. Canada
-
Cochrane Systematic Review Workshop: Perdana University, Selangor, Malaysia
-
Cochrane Trainer's Toolbox
Pages