Following the launch of the new website, we are working on restructuring the Community and the Training sites.
Until this work is finished, some content you find here may still be relevant but some may be outdated.
Index
- Module 3: Introduction to systematic reviews
- Module 4: Understanding and using systematic reviews
- Module 5: Consumer involvement in Cochrane
- Module 5: Consumer involvement in Cochrane
- Module 5: Consumer involvement in Cochrane
- Módulo 1: Medicina basada en la evidencia
- Módulo 2: Ensayos controlados aleatorizados
- Módulo 3: Introducción a las revisiones sistemáticas
- Módulo 4: Comprensión y uso de las revisiones sistemáticas
- Motivating, Managing and Training Volunteers: Case Studies from Cochrane's Translation Teams
- Mulitiplicity and subgroup analysis - Beware!
- Network meta-analysis on disconnected evidence networks: What can be done?
- Network meta-analysis online workshop
- Network meta-analysis: from planning to publication: Paris, France
- New developments in Cochrane methods workshop - Penang, Malaysia
- New guidance on reporting the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool
- NMAstudio: a fully interactive tool for network meta-analyses
- No Choice of Outcomes About us Without us!
- Online GRADE course by Cochrane Belgium
- Online Journal Club – What Makes a Good Rapid Review?
- Online Systematic Review course by Cochrane Belgium
- Online workshop on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of prognosis studies with the Prognosis Methods Group (February 2022)
- Overdiagnosis and Low Value Healthcare (webinar)
- Overviews of reviews
- Part 1: About Cochrane Reviews
- Part 1: About Cochrane Reviews
- Part 1: About Cochrane Reviews
- Part 2: Core methods
- Part 2: Core methods
- Part 2: Core methods
- Part 2: General issues in pre-specification
- Part 3: Specific perspectives in reviews
- Part 3: Specific perspectives in reviews
- Part 3: Specific perspectives in reviews
- Part 3: The notion of PICO for synthesis
- Part 4: Other topics
- Part 4: Other topics
- Part 4: Other topics
- Part 4: Planning a Cochrane review to compare multiple interventions: network meta-analysis
- Part 5: Issues to consider when including qualitative evidence
- Part 6: The problem of multiplicity and the use of hierarchical selection rules
- Part 7: Special issues for addressing adverse effects
- Part 8: Issues in reviews of test accuracy
- Part 9: Questions and answers
- Patient and public involvement in research: What, why and how?
- Peer review policy (webinar)
- Peer review training modules for dietitians
- Performing meta-analyses in the case of very few studies
- Planning eligibility criteria
- Policy on co-publishing Cochrane Reviews in other journals
- Practical methods for handling missing summary statistics in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes
- Preferred and acceptable risk of bias tools for non-randomised studies of interventions (Methods Support Unit web clinic)
- Presentation Styles [webinar]
- Priority Setting in Action: experiences from two Cochrane Review Groups
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
- Prognosis Research in Healthcare: Concepts, Methods and Impact: (online workshop)
- Public Engagement and Involvement in Health Research: How well are we doing? Views from the global north vs the global south
- Public Engagement and Involvement in Health Research: How well are we doing? Views from the global north vs the global south
- Public Participation Impact: the other PPI
- Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) and GRADE-CERQual - Melbourne, Australia
- Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES): Learning Live webinar series
- Quantiles of the marginal and conditional dose-response relation based on weighted mixed-effects models
- Question formulation and protocol development for systematic reviews with network meta-analysis
- Question formulation and searching for qualitative evidence
- R package 'crossnma' to synthesize cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-analysis and network meta-regression
- Rapid evidence synthesis for COVID-19 research
- Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Balancing rigour with speed (webinar)
- Rapid Reviews - Dr Andrea Tricco (webinar)
- Rapid reviews from the ground up
- Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems
- Reaching an overall RoB judgement and incorporating RoB assessment into analysis and interpretation
- Recommendations and guidance on responsible AI in evidence synthesis
- Registration and reporting of drug trials on humans (Cochrane Sweden webinar)
- Reporting guideline for synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM)
- Reporting Guidelines for Equity-Focused Systematic Reviews: PRISMA-E 2012
- Research priority setting with patients and the public
- RevMan Calculator
- Risk of Bias 2: Good practice and common errors
- RoB 2 Bias in other types of studies: cluster-randomised and cross-over
- RoB 2 Domain 1: Bias arising from the randomisation process
- RoB 2 Domain 2: Bias due to deviations from the intended interventions
- RoB 2 Domain 3: Bias due to missing outcome data
- RoB 2 Domain 4: Bias in measurement of the outcome
- RoB 2 Domain 5: Bias in selection of the reported result
- RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials
- RoB 2: Editorial considerations
- RoB 2: Learning Live webinar series
- Running webinars and virtual workshops: good practice guidance
- Safeguarding trust in evidence: the Individual Participant Data Integrity Tool
- Scoping reviews: what they are and how you can do them
- Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers
- Searching for adverse effects
- Selecting studies and assessing methodological limitations
- Shared learning: How to apply PPI in multinational and multi-group research
- Sitemap
- Software to Support the Systematic Review Process: York, UK
- Software to Support the Systematic Review Process: York, UK
- Soo Downe: Changing the conversation: How QES reviews can frame and inform guidelines and implementation (webinar)
- SPFT Youth PPI Café: A framework for the meaningful involvement of young people in mental health research
- Stakeholder Involvement in Evidence Synthesis
Pages
Share