Index
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
- Prognosis Research in Healthcare: Concepts, Methods and Impact: (online workshop)
- Public Engagement and Involvement in Health Research: How well are we doing? Views from the global north vs the global south
- Public Engagement and Involvement in Health Research: How well are we doing? Views from the global north vs the global south
- Public Participation Impact: the other PPI
- Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) and GRADE-CERQual - Melbourne, Australia
- Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES): Learning Live webinar series
- Quantiles of the marginal and conditional dose-response relation based on weighted mixed-effects models
- Question formulation and protocol development for systematic reviews with network meta-analysis
- Question formulation and searching for qualitative evidence
- R package 'crossnma' to synthesize cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-analysis and network meta-regression
- Rapid evidence synthesis for COVID-19 research
- Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Balancing rigour with speed (webinar)
- Rapid Reviews - Dr Andrea Tricco (webinar)
- Rapid reviews from the ground up
- Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems
- Rapid reviews webinar series
- Reaching an overall RoB judgement and incorporating RoB assessment into analysis and interpretation
- Registration and reporting of drug trials on humans (Cochrane Sweden webinar)
- Reporting guideline for synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM)
- Reporting Guidelines for Equity-Focused Systematic Reviews: PRISMA-E 2012
- Research priority setting with patients and the public
- RevMan Calculator
- Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) workshop - Penang, Malaysia
- Risk of Bias 2: Good practice and common errors
- RoB 2 Bias in other types of studies: cluster-randomised and cross-over
- RoB 2 Domain 1: Bias arising from the randomisation process
- RoB 2 Domain 2: Bias due to deviations from the intended interventions
- RoB 2 Domain 3: Bias due to missing outcome data
- RoB 2 Domain 4: Bias in measurement of the outcome
- RoB 2 Domain 5: Bias in selection of the reported result
- RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials
- RoB 2: Editorial considerations
- RoB 2: Learning Live webinar series
- Running webinars and virtual workshops: good practice guidance
- Scoping reviews: what they are and how you can do them
- Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers
- Searching for adverse effects
- Selecting studies and assessing methodological limitations
- Shared learning: How to apply PPI in multinational and multi-group research
- Sitemap
- Software to Support the Systematic Review Process: York, UK
- Software to Support the Systematic Review Process: York, UK
- Soo Downe: Changing the conversation: How QES reviews can frame and inform guidelines and implementation (webinar)
- SPFT Youth PPI Café: A framework for the meaningful involvement of young people in mental health research
- Stakeholder Involvement in Evidence Synthesis
- Statistical methods for updating meta-analyses
- Study centric data analysis and data management in RevMan: methodological background and practical application
- Success of living systematic reviews for rapid evidence synthesis and surveillance (Cochrane Ireland webinar)
- Summary of findings table common errors (Methods Support Unit web clinic)
- Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline
- Systematic Review Advanced Author Training: Dublin, Ireland
- Systematic review of prognosis studies
- Systematic Review Standard Author Training workshop: Michigan, USA
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy 2019 - Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (online workshop)
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of intervention studies: Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of prognosis studies (online workshop, February 2022)
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of prognosis studies: Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies Workshop - Lund, Sweden
- Systematic reviews of preclinical animal research: who are the potential knowledge users?
- Systematic Reviews of Quantitative and/or Qualitative Evidence 2020: Leuven, Belgium
- Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and real world evidence: an introduction
- Systematic Search for Systematic Reviews Workshop
- TaskExchange for Cochrane Review Groups and consumer involvement tasks
- TaskExchange: a new hub for Cochrane Consumers
- TaskExchange: Information, questions and feedback
- Team considerations, study selection, risk of bias and data extraction in rapid reviews
- Temp HRI Version 6
- Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR)
- Términos y Condiciones
- Terms and Conditions
- Terms and Conditions
- The 11th Guideline Development Workshop: focus on GRADE for Intervention: Orlando, USA
- The EASE science editors' handbook
- The Nottingham Systematic Review Course - Nottingham, UK (June 2022)
- The ROB-MEN tool to evaluate the risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis
- The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings
- Thematic Synthesis
- Tips and tools for hosting a webinar
- Trainers' Week virtual conference April 18 - 22, 2016
- Training Innovations Fund winner: Cochrane ClassMate
- Transforming Healthcare through Evidence-based Practice: Columbus, OH, USA
- Translating critical appraisal of a manuscript into meaningful peer review
- UK Society of Editors and Proofreaders workshops
- Understanding and Critiquing Health Economics Models: York, UK
- Understanding systematic reviews – an introduction for health professionals, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Undertaking a qualitative evidence synthesis to support decision-making in a Cochrane context
- Updated GRADE guidance for imprecision rating using a minimally contextualized approach
- Updated guidance on how to interpret and assess imprecision with GRADE methods
- Using GRADEpro to perform a GRADE assessment and make a summary of findings table
- Using the GRADE approach to summarise evidence for policy and practice (Online, April 2022)
- Using the GRADE approach to summarise evidence for policy and practice: Melbourne, Australia
- Versions and changes to the Handbook
- Virtual Methods Symposium
- Virtually Cochrane 2021
- Visualising Cochrane Evidence in practice: experience from the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders group
- Webinar: COVID-19 Pandemic: Navigating Evidence and Guidance in a Crisis
- Webinar: Developing conceptual models through Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
Pages
Share