Following the launch of the new website, we are working on restructuring the Community and the Training sites.
Until this work is finished, some content you find here may still be relevant but some may be outdated.
Index
- Cochrane and Wikipedia: Improve online health-related information accessed by billions of people each year. How, When, and Why
- Cochrane Belgium: Systematic Review course
- Cochrane Consumer workshop: Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- Cochrane handsearching course
- Cochrane Information Specialists' Handbook
- Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an intervention review
- Cochrane International Mobility
- Cochrane Qualitative Methods Glossary
- Cochrane Rapid Reviews: Learning Live webinar series
- Cochrane Reviews - Basics for Authors (online course in German)
- Cochrane Standard Author Training: Edmonton, Canada
- Cochrane Statistical Methods Group training course
- Cochrane Style Manual
- Cochrane Systematic Review Training Workshop (Virtual workshop in French)
- Cochrane Systematic Review Training Workshop, Québec, Canada
- Cochrane Systematic Review Training Workshop: Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Cochrane Systematic Review Training Workshop: Québec. Canada
- Cochrane Systematic Review Training Workshop: Québec. Canada
- Cochrane Systematic Review Workshop: Perdana University, Selangor, Malaysia
- Cochrane Training
- Cochrane 干预措施系统评价手册 中文翻译版
- Cochrane’s new Conflict of Interest policy - How do I deal with “non-financial” interests?
- Cochrane’s new Conflict of Interest Policy – what you need to know
- Cochrane’s new Conflict of Interest Policy – what you need to know
- Collecting and managing declarations of interest: a webinar for Managing Editors
- Collecting study characteristics
- Combining randomised and non-randomised evidence in network meta-analysis (NMA)
- Comentarios
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) eLearning course
- Common errors in meta-analysis – lessons from the Cochrane review screening programme [webinar]
- Common Errors: Check your knowledge [exercise]
- Common Errors: GRADE and interpretation of findings
- Common Errors: Inconsistency and inaccuracy
- Common Errors: Interpretation of statistical results
- Common Errors: Summary versions of a review
- Comparing test accuracy: from pairwise to network meta-analysis of tests
- Component network meta-analysis: concepts and insights
- Conflict of interest and Cochrane Reviews
- Considering scope at the review planning stage
- Consumer-led knowledge translation
- Consumers webinar: Consumers for the Terrified - Exploring new ways of involving consumers in the work of Cochrane
- Core principles for dissemination: Introducing Cochrane’s new Dissemination Checklist
- Course on Cochrane reviews and other systematic reviews of medical interventions (In-person course: Odense, Denmark)
- COVID-19 Rapid Reviews: Cochrane’s response so far
- Critical appraisal of Qualitative Research (Virtual workshop)
- Critical appraisal of Randomised Controlled Trials (Virtual workshop)
- Critical appraisal of Systematic Reviews (Virtual workshop)
- Critical Evaluation of Medical Studies: IP Centre Vienna, Austria
- Cross-cultural team working within Cochrane
- Crystal clear reporting: importance of using PRISMA for systematic reviews
- Data collection form (for RCTs)
- Dealing with rare events in Cochrane reviews
- Designing Knowledge Translation Strategies: Using online surveys to identify target audience characteristics and evidence needs
- Developing a Protocol for a Cochrane Systematic Review - Penang, Malaysia
- Developing a tool for detecting problematic RCTs in health systematic reviews: the INSPECT-SR project
- Developing our international PPI evidence base through high quality reporting: The evolution and use of GRIPP2
- Developing your implications for research section (Methods Support Unit web clinic)
- Development of materials to facilitate implementation of methods for presentation and statistical synthesis when data are not amenable to meta-analysis (Methods Support Unit web clinic)
- Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) reviews
- Dichotomous and continuous outcomes
- Dig a little deeper – using Clinical Study Reports for systematic Reviews: Freiburg, Germany
- Dose-Response Meta-analysis (online workshop)
- Economic Modelling Techniques for the NHS & Public Health: York, UK
- Editorial considerations in reviews with network meta-analysis
- Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
- Editorial process of Cochrane DTA Reviews
- Eligibility designs
- Engagement of Key Stakeholders in Evidence Synthesis (webinar)
- Engagement tactics for live online learning sessions
- Entering data with the RevMan calculator
- EQUATOR Network toolkit for editors
- Evaluating knowledge translation: How do we know we’re making a difference? Part 1: Tools to plan and evaluate your knowledge translation activities
- Evaluating knowledge translation: How do we know we’re making a difference? Part 2: Collecting and analysing feedback
- Evidence Essentials
- Evidence of diagnostic interventions: Freiburg, Germany
- Evidence synthesis and certainty of evidence ratings in rapid reviews
- Experiences from implementation of PPI in healthcare research in Denmark 2009-2019
- Exploring heterogeneity
- Extracting data from figures using software
- Finding clarity in complexity: An introduction to the concept of network meta-analysis (Cochrane Ireland webinar)
- Follow-up emails
- Full economic evaluations
- GDT tutorial: Creating a GRADE evidence table
- Getting to know EPPI-Reviewer [webinar]
- Good practice guidance to identify and avoid the common errors in systematic reviews
- GRADE - from Medical Studies to Guidelines: Danube University Krems, Austria
- GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence from network meta-analysis and Summary of findings tables
- GRADE CERQual
- GRADE for interventions (online course)
- GRADE Guideline Development Workshop: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- GRADE-CERQual (online course)
- GRADE-CERQual: An introduction for qualitative evidence synthesis [webinar]
- Guidance for systematic review authors on how to consider the individual and the population perspective
- Handling heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews
- How can I contribute to COVID-19 health evidence projects? (webinar)
- How can the framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) be used to improve the quality of Cochrane reviews?
Pages
Share